Turn Inside Out

Top Performing Decklists

Deck Creator Record Best Finish
Rakdos Aggro stalonge 7-1 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769901
Rakdos Aggro bunnyfat 7-2 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765740
Gruul Leyline platinum-mythic rank player 6-0 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025

Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)

Win Rate Impact
+2.7%
vs average deck
Top Table Win Rate
83.3%
placement-weighted
Meta Trend
+4.7%
recent vs earlier
Sample Size
32
decks
Tournament Results
16
1st place
20
top 8
Average Copies
3.8
per deck

Meta Performance Analysis

Turn Inside Out ranks #41 out of approximately 405 cards in raw efficiency (top 10%).

Game Impact Factor
82.57
How much this card influences game outcomes
Color Differential
+13.82%

Red average: 63.1%

Performance compared to other Red cards

Based on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Turn Inside Out is a very strong card that performs well in most contexts.

Recommended number of copies: 3

Win Rate Timeline

Card Efficiency Analysis

Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
77.7
Win percentage points per mana invested
Relative Efficiency
1.02x
Compared to average cards of same mana value

Performance Efficiency: 48.53 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)

At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 76.2%. Turn Inside Out has a win rate of 77.7%, making it 2.0% better than other 1-mana cards.

Top Performing Partners

Card Name Type Deck Count Win Rate 1st Places
Furnace Reins Sorcery 28 76.5% 15
Cori-Steel Cutter Artifact — Equipment 13 76.4% 7
Wild Ride Sorcery 7 75.0% 4
Leyline of the Void Enchantment 73 71.4% 16
Soul-Guide Lantern Artifact 6 69.9% 2
Desperate Measures Instant 15 68.9% 5
Duress Sorcery 72 68.0% 20
Demonic Ruckus Enchantment — Aura 16 67.0% 4
Go for the Throat Instant 27 66.7% 5
Obstinate Baloth Creature — Beast 102 66.4% 28

Card Synergy Analysis

Cards that perform better with Turn Inside Out than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.

Card Name Type Mana Decks Win Rate Together Win Rate Apart Synergy Score
Snakeskin Veil Instant 1 5 90.3% 79.8% +10.5%
Questing Druid Creature — Human Druid // Instant — Adventure 2 8 87.8% 77.5% +10.3%
Obstinate Baloth Creature — Beast 4 8 86.0% 76.5% +9.5%
Screaming Nemesis Creature — Spirit 3 5 81.0% 75.0% +5.9%
Burst Lightning Instant 1 15 82.7% 77.1% +5.6%
Wild Ride Sorcery 1 7 86.1% 81.9% +4.2%
Emberheart Challenger Creature — Mouse Warrior 2 29 78.4% 75.9% +2.6%
Sunspine Lynx Creature — Elemental Cat 4 17 79.5% 77.0% +2.5%
Cori-Steel Cutter Artifact — Equipment 2 13 79.7% 77.8% +1.9%
Heartfire Hero Creature — Mouse Soldier 1 32 77.7% 75.8% +1.8%

Top Archetypes

Archetype Deck Count % of Archetype Win Rate
Gruul Leyline 189 100.0% 57.3%
Gruul Aggro 159 7.7% 44.7%
Rakdos Aggro 58 85.3% 57.7%
Red Deck Wins 21 1.5% 38.9%
Unclassified 4 2.0% 17.9%

Statistics Explanation

Statistic Description Formula
Win Rate Impact How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks)
Top Table Win Rate A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight)
Meta Trend Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period)
Confidence Factor A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). log10(Number of decks + 1)
Average Copies The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks)
Card Synergy Score Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates)
Raw Efficiency Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. (Win rate) / (Mana value)
Relative Efficiency How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value)
Performance Efficiency Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value)
Game Impact Factor A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100)
Color Differential How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. Win rate - Average win rate for same color

All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.